<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0"
xmlns:rawvoice="https://blubrry.com/developer/rawvoice-rss/"

	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: ALIENS (1986)	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://unaffiliatedcritic.com/2012/04/aliens-1986/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://unaffiliatedcritic.com/2012/04/aliens-1986/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2025 17:42:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Sean I.		</title>
		<link>https://unaffiliatedcritic.com/2012/04/aliens-1986/#comment-26413</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean I.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2025 17:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://unaffiliatedcritic.com/?p=7462#comment-26413</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Aha, here&#039;s the bit about the Malcolm X glasses. I knew I remembered that from somewhere, but I thought you&#039;d done a whole treatment of Alien 3.

What with Alien: Earth showing up recently I&#039;ve been watching all the Alien oeuvre - I&#039;ve never seen all of Alien 3 nor Resurrection, and after attempts in the last week, I still haven&#039;t. I mustn&#039;t put words in your mouth - you&#039;re so much better with them than I - but I have a hunch you&#039;d agree that the entire franchise would have been best served if only Alien and Aliens were ever made. Alien 3 and Resurrection both look cheap and, far worse, they&#039;re boring. How one does that to an Alien movie, especially with the cast Resurrection had, I could not say.

My very best to you and yours.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aha, here's the bit about the Malcolm X glasses. I knew I remembered that from somewhere, but I thought you'd done a whole treatment of Alien 3.</p>
<p>What with Alien: Earth showing up recently I've been watching all the Alien oeuvre &#8211; I've never seen all of Alien 3 nor Resurrection, and after attempts in the last week, I still haven't. I mustn't put words in your mouth &#8211; you're so much better with them than I &#8211; but I have a hunch you'd agree that the entire franchise would have been best served if only Alien and Aliens were ever made. Alien 3 and Resurrection both look cheap and, far worse, they're boring. How one does that to an Alien movie, especially with the cast Resurrection had, I could not say.</p>
<p>My very best to you and yours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
